Insurance Bad Faith
Overview
An insurance company owes its insured the duty of good faith and
fair dealings. When the insurance company breaches that duty it acts
in bad faith and can be responsible for the damages it causes.
The California insurance bad faith attorneys at Cheong, Denove,
Rowell & Bennett know that insurance companies often put their own
financial interests ahead of their insured's interest. When that
happens the insured needs a law firm that has the experience and
ability, desire and courage to fight for their rights.
What is Insurance Bad Faith?
When you buy insurance, you buy a promise from the insurance
company to protect you in times of need. An insurance policy is a
contract like any other contract. However, given the great disparity
in bargaining power between an insurance company and most insured's,
the law imposes a greater obligation of good faith and fair dealing
in the way an insurance company is to deal with its insured's.
Accordingly, if the insurance company acts unreasonably in the
handling of an insured's claim, it may be also liable for breach of
the implied good faith and fair dealing, commonly referred to as
"bad faith."
Examples of Insurance Bad Faith
The following are some examples of instances where an
insurance company acts in bad faith toward its insured.
Withholding
policy benefits
Repeatedly
asking for additional information to support a valid claim
Denying
a claim based on arbitrary or unreasonable standards
Failing
to state in writing the reasons why a claim is denied
Failing
to evaluate a claim objectively
Refusing
to defend an insured who has been sued
Engaging
in a pattern of unfair insurance practices
Misrepresenting
insurance coverage
Groundless
attempt or threat to rescind an insurance policy
Relying
only on information favorable to the insurance company, while
ignoring evidence in favor of the insured
Refusing
to settle a lawsuit against an insured after a reasonable demand has
been made
Typical Insurance
Bad Faith Defenses
Insured
lied or misrepresented information on the insurance application
Insurance
company relied on advice of its lawyers
Insurance
company acted properly
Genuine
dispute as to the facts upon which the insurance company relied
Insured
had previously released the insurance company for its bad faith
conduct
Damages
If the insurance company is found to be in bad faith,
the
company may be responsible for the following:
Pay
the insured the amount due under the policy
Pay
prejudgment interest
Pay
the insured's attorney fees and costs
Pay
the insured damages for the emotional distress the insurer's bad
faith conduct caused
Pay
punitive damages if the bad faith conduct is found to be malicious,
oppressive or fraudulent
Conclusion
When an insurance company is sued for bad faith, it has the money
to have the best defense attorneys. At Cheong, Denove, Rowell &
Bennett we believe the victim of insurance bad faith has the right
to an attorney with at least as much experience.
The insurance bad faith attorneys at Cheong, Denove, Rowell &
Bennett have successfully handled matters against numerous insurance
companies including: Aetna, A.I.G., Allstate, Amica Mutual,
Automobile Club of Southern California, Blue Cross, Carolina
Casualty, Century National, Crusader, Employers Casualty, Farmers,
Hartford, Humana, Kaiser, Reassure America, Safeco, Standard, State
Farm, Truck and Unum - Provident.
The attorneys at Cheong, Denove, Rowell & Bennett have authored
papers
and have been invited to
speak
before other attorneys to educate them on the law of insurance bad
faith and trial practice.
Cheong,
Denove, Rowell & Bennett
has the extensive resources to handle the most complex legal
matters, yet is small enough to offer individualized service to
our clients.
At Cheong,
Denove, Rowell & Bennett we believe the more you know,
the better choice you will make.
Contact Us
<back to top>
The information you
obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
This web site is designed for general information only. The
information presented at this site should not be construed to be
formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client
relationship.